An analysis of the tragedy of the challenger in astronomical research

I placed an order for a 3-page essay.

An analysis of the tragedy of the challenger in astronomical research

Among other things, the program served as a symbolic indicator and expression of American values and possibilities Sizemore On that day, seventy-three seconds after liftoff, the space shuttle Challenger exploded, completely obliterating the vehicle and instantly killing its seven-member crew.

As President of the United States, Ronald Reagan was tasked with responding effectively to the rhetorical situation generated by the Challenger disaster, one shaped by three primary exigencies. First, the national tragedy called for praising the dead and consoling the living.

Finally, as suggested above, the space program served as a symbolic indicator and expression of American competence, innovation, and progress. Consequently, paralleling the material destruction of the Challenger and her crew was the symbolic damage done to American Doxa.

More Challenger | !The Oklahoman News and Information |

This third exigency tasked Reagan with rhetorically repairing that tear. As a comforter, national father, and an American, Reagan was very effective in meeting the emotional needs of five audiences including the USA, families of the fallen astronauts, school children, the Soviet Union and NASA. He uses ethos to communicate shock and grieve to the Americans while comforting the American people and reassuring them the importance of the program.

It depicts a connection between characters and ethos. The speech starts off by expressing pathos in the feeling of pain and loss that the nation shared toward the disaster. The Challenger Seven acts of bravery, courage, and dedication were exemplified in their decision to accept to take part in the mission.

Reagan acknowledges the heroism of the crew while mourning with their families. In great pain, it is possible to forget the reality. Reagan had the noble and also an unfortunate responsibility to remind Americans that the astronauts were doing their work and while this does not diminish their sacrifice, it acknowledges that they knew the risks and were prepared to accept the risks.

According to Walton 63it is easy to trust someone we believe is intelligent, well informed, is clear-headed and reasonable. Reagan demonstrates practical wisdom by avoiding restating the grisly circumstances of the death of the astronauts because the nation had already watched the original event.

He used a language that purposely avoided evocative imagery and sought to check such evocation. Reagan sees the tragedy as an opportunity for advancement and uses the logos and ethos of the Space Program to show how far we have come since the program was started and shows the commitment to continue.

According to Hauser 21we can trust people who speak with integrity, who make virtuous decisions and those who appear to be truthful. The speech demonstrates a virtuous level of modesty.

By deciding to set aside his planned State of the Union address to attend to the critical issue, Reagan demonstrated statesmanship.Challenger: A nation stunned by the tragedy remembers crew, its mission but an analysis of employment data and the recent surge in large-scale hiring announcements indicate that the so-called.

In , Allan J. McDonald, former director of the Space Shuttle Solid Motor Rocket Project for Morton-Thiokol, Inc. published his book Truth, Lies, and O-Rings: Inside the Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster. Up to that point, no one directly involved in the decision to launch Challenger had published a memoir about the experience.

Rhetorical analysis of Reagan The Challenger Speech; Rhetorical analysis of Reagan The Challenger Speech. Posted: April 04, and I are pained to the core by the tragedy of the shuttle Challenger.

We know we share this pain with all of the people our country. an argumentative essay or a research paper? Don't panic! Contact us and we. Analysis of Ronald Reagan's Sppech, The Challenger Disaster - While seated in the Oval Office of the White house, January 28, President Ronald Reagan delivers his speech The Challenger Disaster; hours after the space shuttle The Challenger explodes while in take off.

The Challenger explosion was the worst setback to the US space program up until that time. It was witnessed by millions of people both on the ground and through live television broadcast.

An analysis of the tragedy of the challenger in astronomical research

ETHICS LECTURES The Space Shuttle Challenger Tragedy – An Overview MAE a 1st ethics lecture – Challenger explosion, January 28, – Columbia re-entry disintegration, February 1, • Ethical Conduct of Research.

Academic Research Papers | ASTRONOMY